Considerations For Amazon Web Services & Crash Recovery
Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud computing platform can considerably analyze a company’s backup and restoration process without the necessity for costly onsite equipment. However, because utilizing AWS is somewhat complex and still requires a specific level of scripting, many businesses preferred to outsource this task to a managed service provider (MSP) or value-added reseller (VAR).
Which backup method is right for you?
When we are talking about the backup and recovery of the data, the primitive consideration should be selecting the best backup approach for your business. With AWS, the two chief options for backups are AMIs and EBS snapshots. An AMI is an encrypted machine model that contains all the information needed to restore your data. EBS Snapshots are substitutes of Amazon EBS volumes which apprehend incremental block-level modifications to the original. Overall, instance store-based AMIs are moderate, less flexible, and more costly than their EBS counterparts. But AMIs, however, be the better option depending on your specific requirements. So before going further, a thorough evaluation is in order.
But regardless of which backup method is best for your recovery, a third-party service like Abacasys can support MSPs and VARs manage, automate, and streamline the backup method.
What are your specific disaster recovery needs?
Once you discover the reliable method for backing up your data, it’s time to generate a backup and recovery strategy. And an important component of backup and improvement for MSPs and VARs is building your tolerance for both downtime and data loss. It’s imperative to determine the amount of money you could lose from downtime/data loss and balance it with the amount of money to be spent on backup and restoration. Only then is it possible to realistically determine how frequently backups should occur, and which AWS disaster recovery method is the best option?
If you have a high tolerance for downtime/data loss, it may make sense to utilize cheaper, less extensive disaster recovery methods. Whereas if you require little or, no downtime should reasonably pay a premium for more thorough methods.